hill robertson effect

topic posted Tue, May 15, 2007 - 10:13 AM by  Jaspreet
Share/Save/Bookmark
Advertisement
hello everyone..im new to dis comm.
do you agree that hill robertson effect is integral to evolution??i mean would evolution hv been possible in the absence of hill robertson effect?
posted by:
Jaspreet
India
Advertisement
Advertisement
  • Re: hill robertson effect

    Mon, May 21, 2007 - 2:57 AM
    First of all, please show us the same courtesy we show you- write entire words, and capitalize and punctuate properly, if at all possible. Please?

    Thanks.

    Hill and Robertson were describing genetic recombination, and explaining its evolutionary advantage to finite populations, if I'm remembering correctly. The fact that the circumstances they describe exist, sorta makes the "effect" pretty much "integral" to any "macro" discussion of evolutionary benefits across the spectrum. To hypothesize "would evolution have been possible in the absence of said effect" is impractical- an effect is not the factors or limitations that CAUSE the effect itself. Think about it.......

Recent topics in "Anthropology"

Topic Author Replies Last Post
Just an intro offlineBo 15 October 16, 2009
more on shields and the frist wars Patrick 2 June 9, 2009
Shield Patrick 9 May 16, 2009
"Hobbit" Skull Study: Species Not Human Jahvan 4 March 29, 2009