You're kidding, right? Describing Darwin's theory of evolution as "Survival of the fittest", shows that there's absolutely NO antropological science involved in the making of this "film". "Why haven't we heard of these discoveries? Oh, we're talking about a massive cover-up". Are you SERIOUS??? This is not a "creation science" production, but it is a "Darwin's evolution as it's being forced upon us is bullshit" film. It's purpose is to discredit Darwinian theory.

These are hypotheses that has no evidence to support them. Hell, the first sentence by Moses and Judah Ben Hur (Charlton Heston), says "scientists gather information and evidence, the offer theories, but nobody really knows where man came from". Sorry, but the very definition of "theory" is being ignored by this question (hypothesis that has been tested repeatedly and rigorously, without being disproved).

ALL "documentary" film has an agenda. ALL documentary filmmakers have a point of view that they are carefully shaping with the interview scripts, edits and dialogue in their film. "Interesting"? Not really. "Entertaining", maybe, but it all strikes me as hit piece, attempting to discredit Darwinian theory, without offering ANY real evidence to support its claims.